This summary outlines the Supreme Court’s analysis of a major land dispute, focusing on the legal arguments and judicial precedents concerning a government agency’s failure to file a timely appeal.
Supreme Court ruled that a sale deed executed without consent or consideration is void, and the plaintiff’s suit for possession is governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act.
Supreme Court held that converting imported Gensets into Power Packs by adding essential components amounts to manufacture under Section 2(f). The process created a distinct, marketable product, making excise duty applicable.
The Supreme Court of India upholds the validity of consolidated GST Show Cause Notices (SCNs) for multiple financial years in fraudulent ITC claims.
Supreme Court upheld a Delhi High Court order directing release of an imported Maserati car seized by DRI on failure to issue a show-cause notice within time prescribed under section 110 (2) of Customs Act, 1962 as section 110A functions as an interim arrangement to allow release of goods, including perishable or fast-moving items, but does not in any way impede or limit the mandatory time limit in Section 110(2).
The Supreme Court of India has upheld a property attachment order from 2012, dismissing a challenge by a company that bought the property years later.
The Supreme Court dismissed a petition, upholding a Kerala High Court ruling that hotels choosing to pay sales tax under regular provisions cannot be assessed under a compounded scheme.
Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, affirming that ITAT rightly remanded the case to TPO to reassess ALP of intra-group services, stressing that Section 92C(3) conditions must be examined before adjustments.
Supreme Court held that speculative investors cannot be permitted to trigger CIRP as this would undermine revival, destabilise projects, and prejudice genuine homebuyers. Accordingly, orders, setting aside admission of the Section 7 applications, stand affirmed.
Supreme Court held that customs duty exemption provided vide notification no. 151/2009-Cus dated 31-12-2009 is available on import of G Watch (Smart Watch) from the Republic of Korea. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
