Supreme Court held that since the claim was filed, verified and informed to the Successful Resolution Applicant, the claim squarely falls within Clause 18.4(ii) read with Clause 18.4(vi)(a) of the Resolution Plan. Accordingly, possession of residential apartment is directed. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
The Supreme Court ruled that recording reasons to believe is mandatory for all warrantless searches under special laws, reinforcing due process and preventing arbitrary action.
The Supreme Court has ruled that an application under the State Bank of India’s (SBI) One Time Settlement (OTS) 2020 Scheme is invalid without the mandatory 5% upfront payment of the settlement amount.
Supreme Court of India upholds a landlord’s eviction claim, ruling that a tenant is legally barred from denying the landlord’s ownership after decades of tenancy.
Supreme Court held that High Court observation regarding appellant’s advised to importer to mis-declare imported goods is incorrect since it was not a case of mis-declaration but a case of mis-classification. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.
Supreme Court stays recovery of GST penalty under Section 122(1A), examines applicability to non-taxable persons and retrospective enforcement.
Supreme Court used its extraordinary power to set aside a High Court order and restore a decade-old appeal related to clandestine removal, ensuring the company gets a remedy.
The Supreme Court modified a High Court order, directing the tax authority to dispose of a school’s income tax refund appeal within two months instead of one year.
The Supreme Court affirmed that GST authorities cannot determine the eligibility of Input Tax Credit during refund proceedings, upholding a Delhi High Court ruling.
The Supreme Court affirmed that services provided by Indian entities to foreign universities for student admissions are considered “export of services” and are eligible for an IGST refund.