The issue under consideration is whether the netting off interest expenditure against interest income is allowed u/s 56 of Income Tax Act?
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in making a disallowance under section 36(l)(ii) of the Act; being bonus paid to the Directors of the Company by holding that such payments are in lieu of dividend or profits?
The issue under consideration is whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in upholding the disallowance made on account of unverifiable purchases? Appel Against Revisionary Order u/s 263 should be Filed Before Tribunal: ITAT Mumbai
ACIT Vs National Film Development Corporation Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) We are of the opinion that considering the facts that assessee’s business -production of films for Ministries of Government of India and various government departments-and the durations for which the amounts were kept with banks the income earned by it has to held as business income. […]
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) As could be seen, while the Assessing Officer has disallowed assessee’s claim of foreign tax credit in respect of income exempt under section 10A/10AA of the Act on the reasoning that only such income which is subjected to tax in both the countries would qualify for […]
DCIT Vs Shamrock Pharmachemi Pvt.Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) We find that assessee is engaged in the business of trading activity of import and export of pharmaceutical ingredients, chemicals and intermediates. We find that the assessee debited a sum of Rs. 4,18,50,792/- in its profit and loss account towards export commission paid to overseas agents, who arrange […]
ACIT Vs Chinsha Property Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Since the company was engaged in the business of real estate, property in Tulsiwadi was acquired for redevelopment. Hence, commercial expediency/business purpose assessee had invested ₹.11.25 Crores in the project. Therefore, interest cannot be disallowed. Ld. DR submitted that Assessing Officer disallowed the interest observing that assessee […]
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in confirming the addition made by AO for non-genuine and bogus purchases by applying profit rate at the rate of 12.5% of the bogus purchases?
Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether deletion of addition of sales tax incentive/ subsidy as capital in nature is justified in law? In the present case, the assessee in this case is engaged in the business of oil and gas exploration, refining of crude oil, manufacturing of and […]
Network Synthetics Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is observed that the assessee has discharged its initial onus to prove the identity, genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness of the parties by filing all these documents. The Tribunal in assessee’s group cases while deleting the additions made u/s. 68 of the Act observed as […]
