Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Mehta HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Mehta HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in confirming the addition made by AO for non-genuine and bogus purchases by applying profit rate at the rate of 12.5% of the bogus purchases? ITAT states that, neither the AO nor CIT(A) has doubted the sales made by assessee out of these bogus purchase. Further, the assessee has produced all the necessary documents in support of purchased transactions such as purchase invoices, purchase register, sales register, stock register, bank statement evidencing payment made by account payee cheque etc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930