Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mehta Equities Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mehta Equities Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in making a disallowance under section 36(1)(ii) of the Act; being bonus paid to the Directors of the Company by holding that such payments are in lieu of dividend or profits? That there is no law that the assessee-company can be forced to pay dividend. However, learned Counsel of the assessee could not make cogent submission regarding the applicability of the provisions of section 36(1)(ii) as to whether the impugned sum would have been fall...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. SUDIP BHATTACHERJEE says:

    Particulars : There is inconsistency in Any sum paid to an employee as bonus or commission for services rendered, where such sum was otherwise payable to him as profits or dividend.[36(1)(ii)]claimed in return in schedule OI and audit report
    ₹30,000
    Amount mentioned in form Annexure 3CD (b)
    ₹0
    Amount mentioned in the Income Tax Return (a)
    ₹30,000
    Variance (b)-(a) returne rectification

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930