Reliance Corporate IT Park Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Payment for software, by no stretch of logic, can be treated as a payment for “a process” liable to be taxed as royalty. When database access by itself does not result in taxation as royalty, such database access being coupled with software licence cannot bring the […]
Bank Of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We find that Section 11 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, provides that ‘for the purposes of the Income Tax Act, 1961, every corresponding new bank shall be deemed to be Indian company and a company in which public is substantially interested’. This […]
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: The investment in Tata Sons by assessee trust was not thus for the purpose of investment in shares, but this shareholding being held by the assessee trust was undisputedly for the purpose of sharing the fruits of the success, of the Tata Group, for the benefit […]
Flower valley Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We find that certain trees lying on assessee’s land were cut since the same were obstructing the hire tension wires of the Electricity Company. For the same, the assessee was compensated for Rs.10.14 Lacs during the year. We observe that the assessee was engaged in […]
Sir Ratan Tata Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Commissioner was clearly in error in invoking powers under section 263 on the ground that the Assessing Officer failed to examine the investments of the trust complying with the provisions of Section 11(5) and Section 13(1)(d) as how the trust was treating the investment, i.e., in […]
Nilesh Ajit Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) A perusal of the assessment order shows that the assessment was reopened to examine misuse of Client Code Modification for tax evasion. No addition was made by the Assessing Officer in respect of the issue for which the assessment was reopened. It is a well settled law […]
Overseas Polymers Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Legislature in Sec. 40(a)(ii) has though provided that ‘any rate or tax levied’ on ‘profits and gains of business or profession’ shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head ‘profits and gains of business or profession’, but then there was no reference to […]
Shree Bal Properties & Finance P. Ltd Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Admittedly, the assessee while computing its income in the previous years under the head ‘Income from House Property‘ had claimed deduction u/s 24(b) of the interest paid on loan raised from ‘Janalaxmi Co-op Bank Ltd’, which funds are stated to have been utilized in […]
Sonali Hemant Bhavsar Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We observe from the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act for limited scrutiny dated 19.09.2016 and find merits in the contentions of the assessee that the said limited scrutiny can not be expanded unless the AO converted it into complete scrutiny with the approval of Ld. […]
R. & H. Property Developer Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Pr. CIT had held the order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3), dated 10.10.2016 as erroneous, in so far it was prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, for the reason, that he had failed to carry out proper investigation as regards the […]
