ITAT Kolkata remands PF/ESI disallowance for AY 2018-19, 2019-20 to AO for verification of statutory due dates. Follows Supreme Court’s Checkmate ruling: employee contributions must be paid by special Act due dates.
ITAT Kolkata allows Begpur Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. 80P(2)(d) deduction on Rs.28 lakh interest. Tribunal distinguished the Totgars SC ruling, holding that interest from deposits with a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction.
ITAT Kolkata remands 80P deduction appeal of Jotesriram Samabay Society back to CIT(A). The Tribunal orders fresh consideration of Rs.89 lakh interest income, stressing need for bifurcation and compliance with the Totgars SC ruling.
ITAT Kolkata deletes the Section 271(1)(c) penalty against Asit Kumar Dutta. The Tribunal ruled that an incorrect deduction claimed by mistake, with full disclosure, does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
ITAT Kolkata remands the Rs.77 lakh Section 69A cash addition against Kulut Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd. back to the CIT(A). New evidence on cash source and Section 80P claim to be examined; Rule 46A procedure is mandatory.
ribunal held that penalty under section 271B cannot be levied without books of account. Only penalty u/s 271A for non-maintenance applies, reduced from ₹1.5 lakh to ₹25,000.
ITAT Kolkata allows Govinda Debnath’s appeal for statistical purposes. Tribunal condoned the 126-day delay after finding the assessee received no CIT(A) hearing notices, remanding the case for fresh, merits-based adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata remands Lakshmi Ojha’s AY 2020-21 appeal to the AO. The Rs.1.76 crore addition for property value difference must be re-adjudicated after obtaining a mandatory valuation report from the DVO in the interest of justice.
The ITAT Kolkata has ruled that an addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act cannot be made on share capital received from group companies when the assessee provides comprehensive documentary evidence, even if the directors of the investing companies do not appear in person.
ITAT Kolkata set aside a tax addition under Section 56(2)(x), ruling that the AO must offer a DVO valuation before relying solely on the property’s stamp duty value.
