Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunil Kumar Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Kumar Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata: Retraction Accepted – No Incriminating Material, Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted- Forced Disclosure Without Evidence Can’t Sustain Penalty – ITAT Kolkata Kolkata Tribunal deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c), holding that Explanation 5A was wrongly invoked when no incriminating material was found during search and disclosure stood retracted. A search u/s 132 was conducted on 05.02.2021 against Healthcare/ESKAG group. Assessee, being a key person, was covered. He originally filed ROI for AY 2015-16 declaring income of ₹21.03 lakh. P...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930