Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sushma Mimani Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sushma Mimani Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Kolkata Tribunal held that reassessment initiated u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 was barred by limitation as the notice u/s 148 was issued after expiry of statutory time limit. Assessee filed return for AY 2013-14 declaring income of ₹6,10,297/-. Original reassessment notice u/s 148 was issued on 30.06.2021 (last permissible date under extended limitation by TOLA).  Pursuant to SC ruling in UOI vs. Ashish Agarwal (2022), such notices issued between 01.04.2021 & 04.05.2022 were deemed as notices u/s 148A(b). AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 25.05.2022 granting 14...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930