ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment order quashed since notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was served after the date of limitation. Since issuance of notice is bad in law, consequent orders is liable to be quashed.
Analysis of ITAT Kolkata’s ruling in Usha Devi Modi vs ITO on Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, addressing capital gains on penny stocks and revisionary jurisdiction.
ITAT Kolkata rules in Shashi Bala Bajaj vs ITO that LTCG addition based on generalized reports, suspicion, and conjectures is not sustainable.
ITAT Kolkata rules that exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) cannot be denied for late filing of income tax return, directing the grant of exemption to Haringhata Mahavidyalay.
Assessee had been mainly providing e-platform for conducting e-auction, e-procurement services for disposal of scrap arisings, surplus stores, etc. from PSUs and Government Departments including Defence.
ITAT Kolkata dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue since tax effect is below the threshold specified by CBDT vide circular no. 5 of 2004 dated 15.03.2024 and also the case doesn’t fall under any exception as per CBDT circular.
ITAT Kolkata cancels ₹20,000 penalty imposed on SNG Microns by NFAC, citing lack of proper notice and communication as grounds for the decision.
ITAT Kolkata held that when date of agreement and date of registration are not same, then, stamp duty value on the date of agreement should be considered. Accordingly, since difference is less than 10%, hence addition u/s. 56(2)(vii) unjustified.
ITAT Kolkata held that allotment letter given by the developer to the assessee way back in 2010 would be construed as an agreement of purchase between the developer and the assessee. Thus, addition u/s. 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act not survived.
Assessee was a private limited company registered as a non-banking finance company (NBFC) with the RBI, engaged in providing loans, advances, and dealing in shares and securities.
