Follow Us:

ITAT Jaipur

Penalty order u/s. 271D/271E beyond 6 months from assessment is barred by limitation

December 15, 2025 1434 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur held that penalty orders under section 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act passed beyond 6 months from end of the month in which assessments were completed is barred by limitation. Accordingly, appeal of revenue stands dismissed.

Full Section 54F Exemption Allowed for Joint Purchase Where Assessee Funded Entire Cost: ITAT Jaipur

December 15, 2025 1224 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT Jaipur held that joint ownership of a new property does not bar full exemption under Section 54F if the assessee funds the purchase and retains control over the asset.

CIT(A) Order Set Aside as Advance Tax Requirement Misapplied in Loss Case

December 13, 2025 357 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT restored the case for fresh adjudication, noting that the assessee filed a return showing a loss and was not given proper opportunity to be heard before dismissal of appeal.

Leave Encashment Exemption Upheld Under Revised CBDT Limit

December 13, 2025 5031 Views 1 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur allows full leave encashment of ₹12.13 lakh under Section 10(10AA), citing CBDT Notification No. 31/2023 and judicial precedents.

Interest on enhanced compensation being part of consideration is exempt u/s. 10(37)

December 13, 2025 1644 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur held that interest received on enhanced compensation is nothing but compensation and hence for the interest received was eligible for exemption u/s. 10(37) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal of department dismissed.

CIT(A) Cannot Set Aside Every Section 144 Order Automatically—Addition Deleted After AO Confirms Reconciliation

December 11, 2025 894 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal clarified that the Section 251 amendment uses the term ‘may set aside,’ meaning it is discretionary. Since the issue was already resolved in remand, addition was deleted.

Amount paid before due date of return not supposed to be disallowed under section 43B

December 10, 2025 663 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur held that the amount paid before due date of filing the return of income is not supposed to be disallowed under section 43B of the Income Tax Act even though the same was outstanding at the year. Accordingly, AO directed to verify the said aspect and pass appropriate order.

Addition u/s. 68 towards cash deposit during demonetization unwarranted as genuineness of cash sales proved

December 9, 2025 534 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit during demonetization under section 68 without rejection of books of accounts is unwarranted. Further, addition is also not warranted as genuineness of cash sale duly proved.

Penalties Under Sections 271D & 271E Deleted for Limitation Breach

November 28, 2025 816 Views 0 comment Print

CIT(A) set aside penalties imposed for violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, as they were issued beyond the statutory limitation period. The ruling reaffirms that late penalty orders are invalid even if violations occurred.

Cash Deposit Addition Deleted for Petroleum Dealer During Demonetization

November 26, 2025 567 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Jaipur ruled that ₹52.78 lakh added under Section 68 for demonetization-period cash deposits was unsustainable, citing reliable books of accounts and factual verification.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031