Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lal Chand Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lal Chand Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Reopening Beyond Six Years Held Time-Barred – ITAT Jaipur Quashes 148 Notice & Assessment as Void Assessee, an individual, filed a return declaring income of ₹3.44 lakh. Assessment was initially completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) in October 2016 after allowing exemption u/s 54F on sale of property. Later, the case was reopened again u/s 147 by issuing a fresh notice u/s 148 on 30.03.2021, alleging excess exemption claim of ₹34.25 lakh, since AO applied section 50C (stamp duty value) instead of actual sale consideration to compute capital gains. CIT(A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930