Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anshu Sahai (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anshu Sahai (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Bogus Purchase Allegation Fails – Only Profit Element to Be Taxed, Rules ITAT Chennai- Entire Purchase Can’t Be Disallowed When Sales Are Accepted – Mere Non-traceability of Suppliers Not Enough- ITAT Chennai Restricts Addition to 12.5% Assessee, engaged in trading of pulses, appealed against disallowance of purchases treated as bogus on the ground that suppliers were found to be “non-existent” during verification. AO held that Assessee failed to produce delivery challans, lorry receipts, & confirmations from parties. AO, therefore, disallo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930