Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Devidass Aswani (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Devidass Aswani (ITAT Jaipur) Rule 46A Violation – CIT(A) Deleted ₹4.11 Cr Addition Based on Unverified Evidence – ITAT Sends Matter Back to AO-Non-Resident’s Foreign Remittance Accepted Without AO’s Cross-Check – Tribunal Restores Assessment Both appeals were filed by the Department against separate orders of CIT(A) Dated 03.02.2025 (quantum) & 04.02.2025 (penalty). Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian employed in Doha (Qatar), had not filed a return for AY 2015-16. Based on information about large deposits, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 & completed it ex-parte u/s 144...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031