EY Global Services Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) These are appeals by the assessee against the respective orders of the ld. CIT (Appeals) for the concerned assessment years. 2. Since issues are common and connected and the appeals were heard together, these are being disposed off by this common order. 3. Since grounds are common […]
AGM Properties P. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) To recapitulate the facts, it is an admitted position that for AY 2013-14 the assessee had originally filed its return of income under section 139(1) of the Act on 15.11.2014 and assessment under section 143(1) of the Act was completed on 15.11.2013. The time limit for issuance […]
Mere non availability of stock register cannot be sufficient to reject trading results when the audited final accounts and other sources including the VAT data are available to cross verify the trading results including the sales verification.
In the present case the claim of deduction under section 54 of the Act is for a residential house built up on three adjacent contiguous plots. He further observed that the principle of multiple residential houses/units holds good till these units are in same physical location and contiguous to each other.
Satya Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT consider it necessary to impose a token cost of Rs.2,000/- to the assessee in aggregate owing to continued negligence shown to the statutory notices at both the levels. The assessee shall deposit the cost awarded in favour of ‘The Prime Minister Relief Fund and receipt thereof shall be […]
Triune Energy Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) In regard to second charge for which penalty is levied for interest on TDS it can be observed that the ld AO in his assessment order had not mentioned a word regarding his satisfaction for proceeding with penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act while passing the […]
If expenses are incurred for business, the same should be allowable as deduction and it is not necessary that expenditure may result in income or there must be substantial income.
HC after analyzing the provisions of section 48 and 112(1) of the Act has concluded that the assessee is entitled to avail the beneficial tax rate under section 112(1) of the Act.
Naresh Chand Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Delhi) In the instant case, the sale deed was made in the month of October, 2013 therefore, the Assessee was supposed to invest u/s. 54EC of the Act within ‘six calendar months’ starting from November onwards and upto the month of April, 2014, which in the instant case […]
Senapati Satija Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In Section 271B of the Act, the discretion has been given to the Assessing Officer to direct the assessee to pay by way of penalty a sum equal to one-half percent of the total sales etc. etc. The provisions empower the Assessing Officer to levy the penalty as per […]
