Follow Us:

ITAT Delhi

ITAT deletes addition for Purchase which was never made by Assessee

September 21, 2021 1224 Views 0 comment Print

Raman Sood Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) On being seen ledger account of the seller of the goods in the relevant Financial year it is noted that there are no credits appearing in the said ledger as being no purchases from the said seller. No purchases made from the seller during the AYr. Under consideration. Evidentiary value […]

Section 153C addition based on mere Statement of 3rd party unsustainable

September 21, 2021 5568 Views 0 comment Print

Kuber Products P Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Statement of 3rd party could not have been used for making an addition in the hands of the assessee in case of search U/S 153A in absence of any corroborative material Delhi High court recent celebrated decision in case of Anand Kumar Jain HUF followed and held […]

ITAT Delhi landmark order on scope of draconian provision of section 153C

September 15, 2021 2592 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Dalmia Bharat and Industries Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Now the questions arising before us in this group of appeals were as Under:- i. Whether assessment framed u/s 153C read with S; ection 143 (3) for assessment year 2006 – 07 and 2007 – 08 are barred by the limitation. ii. Whether the assessment order […]

Expenses incurred for retaining status of company are allowable

September 15, 2021 903 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT Vs Tulip Star Hotel Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) It remains an undisputed fact that the assessee was incorporated on 10.09.1987, made investments in V. Hotels Ltd, which had acquired Centaur Hotel in Mumbai from the Government intending to revive the business of such hotels, but in view of legal dispute with regarding to Centaur Hotel […]

Addition for Accommodation Entry not sustainable if no Adverse Finding by AO

September 13, 2021 3198 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Jaguar Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) We find that there is no dispute that the assessee has received share application money from six companies, out of which, from three companies assessee has received premium for sums aggregating to Rs.103,80,00,000/-. In the case of Ganesh Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., Feelgood Creation Pvt. Ltd., and Beyond […]

Employees Contribution to ESI & PF not allowable if paid after relevant due date

September 12, 2021 19545 Views 0 comment Print

Vedvan Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The solitary ground is directed against the addition of Rs.94,33,788/- u/s 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Brief facts as noted from the impugned order are that an addition u/s 36(1)(va) has been made by the DCIT, CPC, Bangalore on account of delay in depositing the […]

ITAT not allows 100% depreciation on mobile valued less than ₹ 5000

September 10, 2021 2439 Views 0 comment Print

Niho Construction Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee claimed 100% Depreciation on Mobile Phones, each of which cost less than Rs. 5,000/-. But Assessing Officer (AO) restricted the depreciation to 15%, treating them general plant & Machinery. Assessee approached ITAT and AO argued that List of items on which 100% depreciation is allowed is specifically […]

Interest on Non-Convertible Debenture- Shown in P&L A/c but offered for taxation on Maturity

September 9, 2021 5940 Views 0 comment Print

Barring private equity partners (India) private limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) If the Assessee select the option to received Interest on Non-Convertible Debenture at maturity but showing yearly interest in P/L account but offered to tax at the Maturity then AO cannot raise objection. The assessee had subscribed to 7500 NCDs of Rs. 1,000/- each […]

Employees contribution to PF/ESI paid before section 139(1) due date was allowable

September 6, 2021 12075 Views 0 comment Print

Indian Geotechnical Services Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Deduction on payment of employees contribution towards PF/ESI made before the due date of filing Income Tax Return under section 139(1) was allowable as the amended provisions of section 43B as well as 36(1)(va) were not applicable for the assessment year under consideration. Held:  Assessee raised the […]

Bogus accommodation entry | Vague reasons not justify reopening

September 5, 2021 3210 Views 0 comment Print

Suraj Pulses Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) We find that as far as the reasons recorded, though there is a specific mention about amount of 20,50,000/- received by way of accommodation entry, however neither there is any mention from whom the assessee had received the amount nor what is the nature of the entry […]

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031