Attachmate Corporation Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Main issue relates to AO/DRP holding that the payments received by the assessee on sale of software to Indian resellers/distributors is in the nature of ‘Royalty’ chargeable to tax u/s 9(1)(vi) of the I.T. Act and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. ITAT held that payment received by the […]
Nefab India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee has been merely given a license to use the licensed information/technical know-how during the currency of license agreement. Further, there is a confidentiality clause which prevents the assessee from disclosing the licensed information to a third party. To reiterate, the assessee is not entitled to the […]
ACIT Vs M/s. Aerens Buildwell Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) As noticed, the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings has reversed the action of the Revenue. It is trite that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is not automatically attracted merely because it is lawful to do so. The penalty is not ordinarily to be imposed unless assessee obliged in […]
Assessee purchasing the software from ‘Microsoft company’ and as per terms of the agreement with ‘Microsoft’ having no right to reproduce or to make any change in ‘off the shelf software’ and therefore, the question of passing a right by the Assessee to its customers does not arise.
SH. Inder Pal Singh Bedi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Bench is of considered opinion that a presumption of truth is attached to the record of proceedings conducted by public authorities as reflected in their orders though the same is rebuttal. The assessee had the opportunity to rebut the findings of Ld. Assessing officer with regard […]
Jaibharat Mandal Ramlila and Dharmshala Society Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Learned counsel for the assessee insisted that in the absence of any order of refusal of registration by the Competent Authority, the assessee trust may be treated as deemed to have been registered u/s 12AA of the Act. In support of this deposition learned counsel […]
Salesforce.com Singapore Pte Vs DDIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Income earned by assessee from the Indian customers with respect to the subscription fees for CRM could not be taxed as royalty as per section 9(1)(vi) of the Act as well as Article 12(3) of the treaty as by granting access to the information forming part of […]
Mohit Singh L/H of Late Shri Balwant Singh Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) As pointed out on behalf of the assessee, an assessment under Section 143(3) r.w. Section 147 was completed in the instant case, wherein the Assessing Officer has not observed any repayment of loan in cash as alleged in the penalty order. On perusal […]
Udesh Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Admittedly in this case, the AO while recording reasons for selection of the case on the basis of AIR information observed that the Assessee has deposited cash of Rs. 44,00,500/- in his S.B. Account during the F.Y. 2008-09 and therefore issued a verification letter dated 30.10.2015 to the Assessee […]
Vibracoustic India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Addl. IT (ITAT Delhi) The penalty provisions of section 271(1)(c) of the Act are attracted, where the Assessee has concealed the particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. It is also a well-accepted proposition that the aforesaid two limbs of section 271(1)(c) of the Act carry different […]
