OVID Technologies Inc. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) In the case in hand, the revenue derived by the assessee from granting limited access to its data base is akin to sale of book, wherein purchaser does not acquire any right to exploit the underlying copyright. When the purchaser reads the book, he only enjoys the content. […]
This is generally a regular practice in the manufacturing sector which is also followed by the assessee from year to year. The CENVAT credit receivables which could not be set off has been rightly claimed by the assessee as deduction.
Ashok Kumar Tyagi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that the addition of agricultural income as income from other sources was not based on any incriminating/seized material found as a result of search. Even, the disallowance of loss claimed against house property income is also not with reference to any seized material. It is a […]
Smt. Sarita Kashyap Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) A scrutiny of the assessment order would clearly reveal that it is not a case where the Assessing Officer has passed the order mechanically without any inquiry and proper application of mind. Whereas, learned PCIT has considered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue […]
ITAT held that, the said amendment to Section 39(1)(va) and Section 43B effected by Finance Act 2021 is having prospective effect. Since, the said amendment is having prospective effect and not being retrospective one the same cannot be applied to the present case.
GE Intelligent Platforms Asia Pacific Pte Ltd Vs A.C.I.T (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/distributors to non-resident computer software manufacturers/suppliers, as consideration for the resale/use of the computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements, is not the payment of royalty for the use of copyright in the computer software, and that the […]
Incom Cables Pvt. Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) In the present case, there is no dispute that the Director of the assessee Company who was looking after the functioning of the assessee Company, has joined to the course in Harward Business School and Management and the assessee Company has incurred the expenditure of Rs. […]
It is to be noted that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is not automatic. If assessee offers reasonable explanation, then, penalty cannot be imposed.
The two-member bench held that transformation of articles to bring new articles into existence amounts to manufacturing and allowed deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
FCC Co. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT had directed the assessee to file the description of services rendered by the employees of the assessee on their visit to India and the corresponding clause under the Agreement for Dispatch of Engineers under which such services would fall. In response, the assessee furnished Annexure 1 for […]
