ITAT Delhi held that merely making a claim which is not sustainable in law will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars entailing levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act automatically.
ITAT Delhi held that the social security, insurance, relocation expenses which are in the nature of committed and obligated payments are in the nature of reimbursements and not fee for technical services.
ITAT Delhi held that when debt is taken as part of receipts by the charitable trust, repayment of such debt would be accepted as application of income.
Assessing Officer can add other items of income along with the income for the escapement of which the assessment was reopened. However, without assessing that escaped income the Assessing Officer cannot make assessment of other items of income.
ITAT Delhi concluded that grants were given specifically for participation in a particular event held in abroad grant was utilized as per terms and conditions and it was not free for the assessee to use the funds voluntarily. Accordingly approval of CBDT under sections 11(1)(c) of the Act not required.
Blue Stampings & Forgings Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that Assessing Officer is not justified in taking drastic action of rejection of books of account which are audited and are without any qualification solely on the basis of general remarks that photocopy of the bills have been produced instead of original bills. No […]
Once claim has been allowed in scrutiny proceedings, then AO cannot withdraw the claim under section 154, by mere change of opinion and without there being any apparent mistake on record.
ITAT Delhi held that once the assessee was able to demonstrate that the amount received is in the nature of managerial services, it cannot be treated as FTS on estimated basis. Such receipt not being FTS is not taxable in India.
ITAT Delhi held that it is fact that depreciation on software/ machinery was claimed and duly allowed in F.Y. 2012-2013. However, due to uncertainty of business revenue could not be generated by using the software in F.Y. 2013-14. Accordingly, depreciation cannot be disallowed alleging non-generation of revenue.
ITAT Delhi held that levy of surcharge and cess cannot exceed the tax rate of 10% as per India – Japan DTAA. Accordingly, as per article 12 of India – Japan tax treaty the tax to be charged on royalty and FTS shall not exceed 10% of the gross amount of royalty or FTS.
