Assessees must thoroughly discharge initial onus under section 68. Until assessee does so, AO is under no obligation to conduct further inquiries.
Vinit Kumar Vs DCIT – ITAT Delhi clarified the application of Section 56(2)(vii) on properties purchased for more than the circle rate.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in Nijhawan Travel Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, exploring the critical determination that the loss of Chit Fund used for business is allowable as a business loss.
In the case of Navneet Dutta Vs ACIT, ITAT Delhi allowed rectification in the revised return, even though the original return was filed late. ITAT remitted the issue to the Assessing Officer to consider the revised return and make an order in accordance with the law.
ITAT Delhi held that if a matter is restored to AO for passing a rectification order, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act does not survive. The appeal was filed by the assessee against the penalty order.
ITAT Delhi has ruled that additions made under Section 153C of Income Tax Act cannot be sustained without any incriminating material found during a search and seizure operation.
A comprehensive analysis of the ITAT Delhi’s recent ruling in the case of Ballabh Prasad Aggarwal Vs ACIT, involving income tax addition on supposed long-term capital gains from jewellery sale.
ITAT Delhi held that deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act is permissible on account of belated filing of return beyond the prescribed time limit under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act on account of non-payment of TDS unsustainable as TDS already deducted and deposited by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of proceedings under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as there was on failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts.
