Delhi High Court held that rejection of bid of the petitioner by SAIL for not meeting the qualification criteria is not arbitrary and hence interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India unwarranted.
Delhi High Court held that it is outside the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to compel a statutory body (ICAI) to outsource organization of CPE seminars, workshop or conferences.
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court set aside the order and notice issued under Section 148A(d) and 148, respectively, in the case of Premium Estates Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT. The court directed the Assessing Officer to conduct a de novo assessment after the petitioner received the notice on the same day as the order.
Delhi High Court held that when two contradictory final outcomes is delivered vide two different orders, the reasoned outcome based on analysis of material prevails over outcome without an iota of reason.
Delhi High Court held that invocation of provisional attachment provisions u/s 83 of the CGST Act for securing the revenue of another taxable person (and not for the interest of government revenue) is unsustainable in law.
Delhi High Court held that, in respect of gold jewellery, which was exported for exhibitions and re-imported into the country, the procedure of filing of a B/E, under Section 46 of the Customs Act, was inapplicable.
Delhi High Court held that disqualification of Haj Group Organization merely on the basis of uncertainty in respect of the amount of GST to be paid is unjust.
Delhi High Court held that there is no requirement of identity proof for exchange of Rs. 2000 denomination banknotes as it is not the case of demonetization but it is a case of mere withdrawal of Rs. 2000 denomination banknotes from circulation.
Delhi High Court held that case can duly be transferred from Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to Central Circle by way of passing order under section 127 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that rejection of application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (the SVLDR Scheme) merely because of some non-material errors in quantum of duty is unsustainable.
