Case Law Details
Case Name : Ashok Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 1244/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Ashok Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
According to the petitioner, although the amount of alleged bogus purchase bills has been quantified as Rs.24,10,705/- the amount in issue is only Rs.13,73,503/-. It is, thus, the petitioner’s case that Rs.10,37,202/- has been wrongly included.
Mr Puneet Rai, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondents/revenue, on the other hand, cannot but accept that since the reply was on record, the impugned order wrongly notes that the petitioner had not filed the reply.
Therefore, in our view, on this short ground alone, the impugned order deserves to be set aside.
It is ordered accordingly.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.