Delhi High Court granted regular bail on the reasonable grounds based on which it can be believed that the petitioner is not guilty of offence under section 3 of PMLA and also that petitioner has materially co-operated in the investigation.
Delhi High Court scrutinizes the validity of Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) held by Vodafone Mauritius in their tax litigation case against ACIT Circle International Tax.
In a recent case, Delhi High Court ruled that proviso to Section 45(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is an exception for women, exempting them from satisfying the twin conditions of Section 45. The court held that sub-classifying women under different categories and applying twin conditions would violate Article 14 of Constitution. The applicant, accused in a complaint case related to the Unitech Group, was granted bail after undergoing extensive investigations and custody for over 20 months.
Delhi High Court held that the power to grant bail on medical grounds under the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is discretionary. Accordingly, court directed AIIMS to evaluate medical condition of the petitioner.
Delhi High Court granted interim bail on petitioner satisfying the test of proviso to section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) as petitioner is suffering from life-threatening diseases warranting immediate medical attention.
Delhi High Court quashes IT order under Section 148A(d) against Krishna Diagnostic, highlighting errors in property transaction allegations.
Delhi High Court held that interim protection granted as applicant is not named in ECIR and also the applicant is not implicated in any of the Scheduled Offences under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
Delhi High Court held that notice u/s 148 and order thereon issued and passed against a non-extant entity cannot be complied with and hence liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Courts in Sesame Workshop Initiatives (India) Pvt Ltd vs Union of India held that interest should be allowed due to inordinate delay in refunding GST amount to petitioner, setting a precedent for similar cases in future.
Delhi HC In Shri Chhatter Pal & Ors. issued guidelines for mediators while drafting Settlement Agreements in cases of matrimonial disputes.
