Delhi High Court sets aside a tax notice against Majestic Handicraft Private Limited, challenging the claim of accommodation entries.
It is well settled that each day of delay in filing has to be explained. In present case, there are large gaps in time period for which no ostensible reason been provided.
Delhi High Court remands BSNL’s GST refund case to Adjudicating Authority, highlighting the importance of proper document submission under CGST Act.
Show Cause Notice has been issued approximately nine years after last Bill of Entry. In the given facts, we are unable to accept that appellant had issued notice within a reasonable period.
It is essential that the exercise of powers to cancel the registration ab initio, must be based on material on record and some rationale. Further, the taxable person must be put to notice of the proposed action to cancel the registration from a retrospective date so as to provide an opportunity to the said person to show cause why such cancellation should not be from a retrospective date.
Fact that Assessee had filed his ITR for assessment year 2011-12 within time limit proves that Assessee was aware of process of filing ITR.
Commencement of reassessment proceedings while the scrutiny assessment proceedings were on.10.1 Petitioner had taken an objection in that regard, which seems to have escaped the mind of the AO while passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act.
Delhi High Court held that procedure prescribed under rule 7 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 is to be followed for any party (including the person who participated in the anti-dumping investigation) requires any information. Rule 7 procedure cannot be bypassed by resorting to RTI.
By an order dated 08.04.2022 passed in RPG Polymers v. Commissioner of DGST Delhi and Anr. W.P.(C) 5849/2022, the Coordinate Bench of this Court had clarified that such errors, which are apparent on the face of the record, are required to be rectified under Section 161 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Shreedhra Agro LLP Vs Commissioner of Customs (Delhi High Court) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, New Delhi (hereafter ‘CAAR’) whereby the products proposed to be imported by the appellant being ‘Scented & Flavoured and Sweetened Supari’ are classified under […]
