Procedure u/r 7 of Anti-Dumping Rules cannot be bypassed by resorting to RTI

Union Of India Vs Arvind M Kapoor And Anr (Delhi High court)

Delhi High Court held that procedure prescribed under rule 7 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 is to be followed for any party (including the person who participated in the anti-dumping investigation) requires any information. Rule 7 procedure cannot be bypassed by resorting to RTI.

Facts- The Petitioners in P.(C) 2603/2017 jointly filed an application (`Complaint’) before the Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties. The said complaint was filed for initiating investigation qua imports of Styrine Butadine Rubber of 1500 and 1700 series originating in or exporting from European Union, Korea RP and Thailand. Pursuant to the said complaint, the DA vide notification No.14/10/2015-DGAD dated 14th January, 2016 initiated an anti-dumping investigation.

Almost immediately after the investigation was initiated, the RTI Applicant – Mr. Arvind M. Kapoor filed an application dated 29th January, 2016 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information qua seven issues in relation to initiation of anti­dumping investigation concerning imports of SBR from European Union, Korea RP and Thailand.

Conclusion- The entire purpose of having a complete and self-sufficient scheme for disclosure of confidential information under the Anti-Dumping Rules would be defeated if persons who are participating in anti-dumping investigation are permitted to tangentially seek information under the RTI Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.