The issue under consideration is that whether the assessee is required to demonstrate commercial expediency during each year concerning a loan which was availed during previous year relevant to A.Y. 2005-06.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
PCIT Vs Anuj Bansal (Delhi High Court)Approval Under Section 153D Given Without Considering Assessment Records and Seized Material Invalid and Not Curable Under Section 292B of Income Tax Act, 1961
Read about the recent judgment by the Delhi High Court in the case of Advance Systems vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST, where the court ruled that once an appeal has been successful before the appellate authority, no fresh refund applications are required.
In-depth review of the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the case of CIT Vs L.G. Electronics Inc. Korea, highlighting key aspects and the implications of the ruling.
Unravel the ruling of the Delhi High Court in the Vodafone Roaming Services Sarl Vs ACIT case. Understand the implications of the court’s verdict on the disputed income tax assessment order.
Detailed analysis of Delhi High Court’s decision in Home Credit India B.V. Vs ACIT, focusing on the quashing of a reassessment notice due to lack of clarity in its recipient.
Examination of the Delhi High Court’s decision in the Dhiru Realestates Private Limited Vs ITO case, where an income tax notice was invalidated due to allegations not included in the original notice.
A significant judgment from the Delhi High Court in the case of Anita Arora Vs ACIT, dismissing a tax notice due to a deposit error. Find out the details of the case and the court’s verdict.
The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax notice in the case of Jagannath Haldar Through vs. PCIT. The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not taken into account the petitioner’s reply while passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
