Karnataka High Court set aside Order-in-Original after petitioner alleged that it was passed without service of notice or an opportunity of hearing. Matter was remanded for fresh consideration.
The Calcutta High Court held that the PCIT was not authorised to condone the delay in filing Form 10-IC for AY 2024-25 as the applicable CBDT circular covered only earlier assessment years. The Court quashed the order and directed the petitioner to approach the CBDT.
The Kerala High Court held that Section 144B does not require issuance of a draft assessment order to an ordinary assessee. It ruled that the requirement applies only to an eligible assessee as defined under the Income Tax Act.
The Kerala High Court held that although the NCLT order was recorded as a consent order, the petitioner could challenge the portion imposing ₹1 lakh per day for non-compliance. The Court granted time to file an appeal before the appellate tribunal.
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail in an alleged fake GST ITC case after considering that the petitioner had remained in custody for more than four months. The Court imposed conditions requiring cooperation with the trial and non-interference with witnesses.
The Allahabad High Court held that fixing the personal hearing and the last date for filing a reply on the same day violated the principles of natural justice. The GST adjudication order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh proceedings.
The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the prescribed limitation period was without jurisdiction. It quashed both the Section 148 notice and the consequential assessment order.
The Allahabad High Court set aside the rejection of a passport renewal NOC after noting prolonged delays in criminal proceedings and directed issuance of the NOC while also examining compliance with earlier judicial directions.
The Patna High Court declined to interfere with the cancellation of GST registration after noting that the first appeal was filed with a delay of 21 months. The Court also observed that no reasons for the delay were placed on record and left open the remedy of a second appeal.
The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ petition after noting that the respondent company had entered the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The petitioner was granted liberty to revive the matter depending on the outcome before the NCLT.
