ROC Kolkata imposed penalties under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 for filing an incorrect AOC-4 form containing wrong particulars regarding the company’s status as a subsidiary company. The company admitted that due to human error, the relevant field in Serial No. 8(a) was incorrectly marked as “No” instead of “Yes,” resulting in the company being wrongly classified as a “Small Company” in the MCA database. Consequently, the system prompted filing of Form MGT-7A instead of the applicable Form MGT-7. The company later filed Form GNL-1 seeking to mark the original filing as defective so that a revised AOC-4 could be submitted. ROC observed that statutory e-forms are public records relied upon by regulators, creditors, shareholders, and stakeholders, and therefore accuracy in filings is mandatory under Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014. Penalties of ₹10,000 each were imposed on the company and certifying director.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
ROC Kolkata I
4th Floor Plot No.IIIF/16, in AA-IIIF Rajarhat, New Town, Akandakeshari, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 700135
Phone: 033-22877390
E-mail: roc.kolkata@mca.gov.in
Order ID: PO/ADJ/05-2026/WB/02132 | Dated: 14/05/2026
ORDER FOR ADJUDICATION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 454 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 (‘THE ACT’) FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 450 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.
A. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer:
Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide itsGazette notification number S.O. 698(E) dated 10/02/2026 appointed undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred by section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 [herein after known as Act] read withCompanies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.
B. Company details:
In the matter relating to ORBIT POLYMERS & LEATHER CRAFTS INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [herein after known as Company] bearing CIN U19115WB2011PTC171034, is a company registered with this office under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013/1956 having its registered office situated at 479, RAJDANGA MAIN ROAD ED 4 NA KOLAKTA WEST BENGAL INDIA 700107
Individual details:
In the matter relating to TRIDIP KUMAR DUGAR _______
C. Provisions of the Act:
If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be 1[liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person]
D. Facts about the case:
1. Default committed by the officers in default/noticee –
Whereas as Rule 8(3) of Companies (The Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 states that: –
The authorized signatory and the professional, if any, who certify e-form shall be responsible for the correctness of the contents of e-form and correctness of the enclosures attached with the electronic form.
The Company has requested by filing Form No. GNL-1 vide SRN: AC2253845 along with Board resolution, request letter and Affidavit to mark defective the STP approved e-form AOC-4 vide SRN: AB9665835 for the financial Year 2024-25. In the reason, the company stated that due to an inadvertent error, the e-Form AOC-4. It was observed that in Serial No. 8(a) (“Whether the company is a subsidiary company as defined under clause (87) of section 2”), this field was inadvertently marked as “No” instead of “Yes” due to human error. As a result, the Company’s classification in the MCA database was incorrectly recorded as a ‘Small Company’ and consequently, while filing Form MGT-7, the system displayed the message: ‘Please file Form MGT-7A’. To correct the Company’s classification to ‘Non-Small Company?, it is necessary to file a revised Form AOC-4. Upon approval of the revised AOC-4, the Company will be able to file Form MGT-7. In view of the above, we humbly request your good office to kindly mark the said Form AOC-4 as Defective or not to be Taken on Record (NTBR) to enable the Company to file a revised Form AOC-4 for the said financial year.
As per Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that: –
If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be 1[liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person].
2. E-Hearing not Requested
E. Order:
1. The Company filed form AOC-4 vide SRN: AB9665835 (impugned e-form).
Upon examination / on the Company?s own admission, it is found that the impugned e-form was filed with incorrect particulars and/or incorrect/defective attachment(s), namely: due to an inadvertent error, the e-Form AOC-4. It was observed that in Serial No. 8(a) (“Whether the company is a subsidiary company as defined under clause (87) of section 2”), this field was inadvertently marked as “No” instead of “Yes” due to human error.
The Company has accepted the above defect/mistake and has requested that the impugned e-form be marked as defective and/or that it be treated as an incorrect filing, vide Form No. GNL-1 vide SRN AC2253845.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the company and certifying Director.
In response the noticee(s) admitted the defect/incorrect filing and stated that the incorrect filing was inadvertent and requested a lenient view.
The MCA electronic registry is a public record and statutory filings are relied upon by regulators, creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. Filing an e-form with incorrect contents and/or enclosures defeats the purpose of an electronic registry and directly triggers the responsibility fixed under Rule 8(3).
In the present case, the impugned e-form was filed with incorrect particulars/enclosures, which has been admitted by the Company. The Certifying Director is liable for contravention of Rule 8(3).
The request to mark the form as defective is an administrative rectification step and does not erase the completed contravention arising from filing an incorrect statutory e-form. Penalty liability under Rule 8(3) read with Section 450 therefore remains attracted.
In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, the undersigned hereby imposes penalty for violation of Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 read with Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, as under:
The Company/noticee(s) are further directed to rectify the defect by taking necessary steps on the MCA portal (including filing the correct/appropriate e-form and making necessary request(s) for marking the incorrect filing as defective, wherever such facility/process is prescribed), within prescribed time from the date of receipt of this order, and to intimate this office with proof of compliance.
2. The details of penalty imposed on the company, officers in default and others are shown in the table below:
| (A) | Name of person on whom penalty imposed (B) | Rectification of Default required
(C) |
Penalty Amount
(D) |
Additional Penalty (E) (*Per day of continuing default i.e. date of rectification of default less order issue date) | Maximum limit for Penalty (F) |
| 1 | ORBIT POLYMERS & LEATHER CRAFTS INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED having CIN as U19115WB2011P TC171034 | 10000 | 0 | 200000 | |
| 2 | TRIDIP KUMAR DUGAR having DIN as 01158733 | 10000 | 0 | 50000 |
3. The notified officers in default/noticee shall rectify the default mentioned above and pay the penalty, so applicable within 90 days of receipt of the order.
4. The notified officers in default/noticee shall pay the penalty amount via ‘e-Adjudication’ facility which can be accessed through the respective login IDs on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs and upload the copy of paid challan / SRN of e-filing (if applicable) on the ‘e-Adjudication’ portal itself. It is also directed that the penalty so imposed upon the officers in default shall be paid from their personal sources/income.
5. Appeal against this order may be filed in writing with the Regional Director, RD Kolkata within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ setting for the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order [Section 454 (5) & 454 (6) of the Act, read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014].
6. For penal consequences of non-payment of penalty within the prescribed time limit, please refer Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Arya Pyarelal,
Registrar of Companies
ROC Kolkata I
