Company Law : The scheme provides a last opportunity for defaulting companies to file pending returns and financial statements with reduced pena...
Company Law : This guide explains the mandatory conditions, documentation, and procedural steps for converting a partnership into a company. It ...
Company Law : The case examined whether extending redemption timelines amounts to reissuance. The Tribunal held that extensions within statutory...
Company Law : MCA has confirmed that extension of annual filing timelines till 31st December 2025 does not extend statutory deadline for holding...
Company Law : A guide to issuing bonus shares for private companies under the Companies Act, 2013, covering legal frameworks, procedural steps, ...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Company Law : NFRA found major deficiencies in audit documentation and archival practices. The report highlights the need for stronger controls ...
Company Law : The inspection report highlights deficiencies in audit documentation, independence monitoring and compliance with auditing standar...
Company Law : The regulator found that the audit firm lacked an effective monitoring mechanism to ensure firmwide independence policies were pro...
Company Law : NFRAs inspection found gaps in audit documentation, revenue testing, and risk assessment practices, stressing the need for stronge...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for failing to disclose PAN and e-mail IDs of allottees in Form PAS-3. The order ...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for incomplete allottee disclosures in Form PAS-3. The order clarifies tha...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for filing incomplete allottee details in Form PAS-3. The ruling clarifies...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for filing Form MGT-7 more than 500 days late under Section 92 of the Companies A...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for delayed filing of Form MGT-14 relating to approval of financial statements an...
ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for failing to disclose PAN and e-mail IDs of allottees in Form PAS-3. The order highlights strict compliance requirements under Rule 14(6) of the Companies Act framework.
ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for incomplete allottee disclosures in Form PAS-3. The order clarifies that absence of PAN or e-mail details cannot excuse statutory non-compliance.
ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for filing incomplete allottee details in Form PAS-3. The ruling clarifies that occupation details of allottees are mandatory under Rule 12(2) of the Companies Rules, 2014.
ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for filing Form MGT-7 more than 500 days late under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013. The ruling confirms that annual return filing delays attract substantial penalties despite operational or legal difficulties.
ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for delayed filing of Form MGT-14 relating to approval of financial statements and Board’s Report. The ruling reiterates that board resolutions under Section 179(3) must be filed within the prescribed statutory timeline.
ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for delayed filing of financial statements under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. The ruling confirms that prolonged litigation and staff shortage cannot excuse statutory MCA filing delays.
ROC Mumbai levied a penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly stated that CSR provisions were not applicable in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order highlights that directors signing MCA forms are personally responsible for accuracy of disclosures and attachments.
ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of Form PAS-3 under Section 42(8) of the Companies Act, 2013. The authority held that delayed filing of return of allotment attracts a separate penalty under Section 42(9).
ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of Form MGT-14 under Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013. The authority granted reduced penalties after recognizing the company as a start-up eligible for Section 446B benefits.
ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement issue related to one integrated transaction and did not warrant multiple penalties. The authority accepted the company’s contention that Section 42(10) does not contemplate separate penalties for each procedural deviation.
