Court modifies order, prevents entry tax recovery from IMFL manufacturer for April-May 2005 based on a state circular.
Writ petition against CGST Rule 96(10) omission impact on IGST refund order. Court examines rule deletion effect on pending GST proceedings.
Bombay High Court seeks reasons for delay in IT refund to Kalmar India, directs affidavit from PCIT-6 and warns of accountability for interest burden on state.
ITAT Mumbai sends back Hotel Association’s Section 11 deduction case for fresh review, citing lack of proper verification of charitable activities by tax authorities.
Karnataka High Court quashes consolidated GST order against Toshiba Software, remanding for separate orders per period to allow Amnesty Scheme use.
J&K High Court quashes recovery against Lupin Ltd., citing non-compliance with earlier court directions and lack of a reasoned decision.
Explore Schrader Duncan Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise case where ‘O’ rings’ packing and labeling were deemed non-manufacturing under Chapter 4016, absolving them from excise duty
CESTAT held refund claims by Cerner Healthcare valid as original claims were timely and additional documents can’t be treated as fresh claims.
CESTAT Mumbai upholds remand of Nico Extrusion’s re-assessment case, directing Customs to issue a mandatory speaking order within 15 days as per Section 17(5) of Customs Act.
Maharashtra Tribunal remands CST demand case involving Starlog Enterprises and crane sales due to fresh documentary evidence presented by the appellant.
