This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Central Excise Valuation Must Follow Its Own Law, Income Tax Provisions Not a Basis for Reassessment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
In the case of Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, set aside the central excise duty demand imposed by the department. The dispute centered around whether the appellant, Shiva Steel Industries, and its buyer, M/s Ujjawal Ispat Private Limited (UIPL), were “related persons” under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The department had relied on income tax filings, where the com...





