Central Excise Valuation Must Follow Its Own Law, Income Tax Provisions Not a Basis for Reassessment
Case Law Details
Case Name : Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
In the case of Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, set aside the central excise duty demand imposed by the department. The dispute centered around whether the appellant, Shiva Steel Industries, and its buyer, M/s Ujjawal Ispat Private Limited (UIPL), were “related persons” under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The department had relied on income tax f
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.