St. Jude Medical India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Gujarat High Court)
Gujarat High Court has disposed of a petition filed by St. Jude Medical India Private Limited against the Union of India and other respondents. The case, argued by advocate Bharat Raichandani on behalf of advocate Rithik Jain for the petitioner, centered on objections raised in an audit report.
During the proceedings, the court was informed that, according to an affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents on January 28, 2025, all audit paragraphs except Paragraph No. 6 had been closed. Advocate Raichandani contended that Paragraph No. 6, which concerned the alleged non-production of documents by St. Jude Medical during the audit, was unfounded as the company had submitted all necessary documentation.
It was further brought to the court’s attention that the Office of the Assistant Commissioner of GST had communicated with the Senior Audit Officer GSTA (HU) Director General of Audit (Central) via a letter dated May 30, 2024, providing responses to the pending paragraphs of LAR No. 101-2023-24 and requesting that Paragraph No. 6 be dropped.
However, advocate Raichandani noted that Paragraph No. 6 appeared to remain pending. This was indicated in a letter dated May 30, 2024, filed on June 5, 2024, by the respondents regarding the status of LAR No. 101, which stated that records received from the Department were under examination and that Paragraph No. 6 had been included in the CAG draft report, with the final report from the CAG Headquarters awaited. Despite this, the primary grievance of the petitioner concerning Paragraphs No. 1 to 5 of LAR No. 101 had been resolved and accepted by the respondents in their affidavit-in-reply dated January 28, 2025. Considering that the majority of the audit objections had been addressed, the court concluded that keeping the petition pending would serve no further purpose and accordingly disposed of the matter. The notice issued in the case was also discharged.
The matter was argued by Ld. counsel Bharat Raichandani along with Advocate Rithik Jain.
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Unlock All Premium Judgments
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.
