Explore the Enbee Education Centre case vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. CESTAT Ahmedabad clarifies the distinction between ‘consignment agent’ and ‘commission agent.’ Full text of the judgment included.
In the case of Haver Ibau India Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-II, CESTAT Ahmedabad clarifies Rule 3(5B) application for cenvat credit. Full analysis and judgment.
Thyssenkrupp System Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. triumphs in CESTAT Mumbai, successfully challenging service tax demand. Key details of the case explained.
Discover the key details of Rama Colour Prints vs. Commissioner of Service Tax case, highlighting disclosure in ST-3 returns and limitation issues.
Dive into the Jammas Food Supplier vs. Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax case. CESTAT Mumbai clarifies service tax applicability to outdoor caterers.
Bombay High Court’s ruling on anticipatory bail for an applicant accused of availing input tax credit without goods receipt under CGST Act
Bombay High Court addresses the issue of inaction by state officers in responding to representations by an assessee, highlighting the need for accountability.
Explore CESTAT Kolkata verdict in Alkem Health Science vs. Commissioner of CGST & CX, addressing refund claims related to education cess and higher education cess.
Calcutta High Court criticizes an adjudicating authority for not following senior officer’s orders, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline in government offices.
Saket Agarwal Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Introduction: In a significant decision, the Bombay High Court has clarified the jurisdictional boundaries concerning Section 83 of the Maharashtra State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (MGST Act). In the case of Saket Agarwal Vs Union of India, the court found that the State Tax […]
