The CESTAT Mumbai has remanded a service tax dispute back to the original authority for a new adjudication. The case centers on whether tax liability is determined by the date a service is completed or the date payment is received.
CESTAT Mumbai ruled Lehman Brothers India not liable for service tax on winding-up services, setting aside refund rejection and allowing appeals.
The Chattisgarh High Court granted a stay on GST penalty against Ultratech Cement, questioning the use of Section 74 without proven fraud or suppression of facts.
The Bombay High Court directed authorities to review a sugar exporter’s claim for a refund under the RODTEP scheme, ordering a decision on the matter within three weeks.
The Bombay High Court remands a plastic toy manufacturer’s GST classification case, citing a “non-application of mind” by the appellate authority in its refund rejection.
Bombay High Court grants relief to Magna Automotive India and others, following the precedent set in the M/s. Sundyne Pumps and Compressors India Pvt. Ltd. case.
SC issues notice in SLP challenging Bombay HC’s rejection of COVID-19 limitation benefit in IT appeal under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Himachal Pradesh High Court sets aside recovery notice against Hindustan Construction Company, directing the Assistant Commissioner to conduct a fresh assessment for the 2017-18 GST dispute by September 30, 2025.
CESTAT Ahmedabad remands Kohler India’s CENVAT credit case, faulting Commissioner for misapplying a GST-era ruling to pre-GST tax provisions without comparing the laws.
Allahabad High Court stays an order against Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers, ruling it invalid as it was passed after the omission of GST Rule 96(10) without a saving provision.
