This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Post-2003 Amendment: Cutting & Labeling amounts to Manufacture – CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mangal Singh Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mangal Singh Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Post 2003 amendment; activity of cutting, labelling, re-labelling etc. under certain chapters would amount to “manufacture” without going into the question of manufacture; once duty on the final product has been accepted; cenvat credit cannot be denied
We share the recent order passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai. The appellant is selling V belts. It was selling the said goods after cutting, packing/repacking and labelling. It paid central excise duty on the said final product ...





