Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Post-2003 Amendment: Cutting & Labeling amounts to Manufacture – CESTAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mangal Singh Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Mangal Singh Bros. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Post 2003 amendment; activity of cutting, labelling, re-labelling etc. under certain chapters would amount to “manufacture” without going into the question of manufacture; once duty on the final product has been accepted; cenvat credit cannot be denied We share the recent order passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai. The appellant is selling V belts. It was selling the said goods after cutting, packing/repacking and labelling. It paid central excise duty on the said final product ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *