Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs K.M.Mammen (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs K.M.Mammen (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Since the penalty was reduced from 300% to 100% of the tax sought to be evaded, assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 279(1A) of Income Tax.  Moreover, department having failed to challenge the order passed by Single Judge in earlier, could not challenge the directions given by the Court for compounding of criminal prosecution. Held: Assessee was the Chairman and Managing Director of MRF Limited.  AO allegedly received information that assessee had transferred through LGT Bank Liechenstein, substantial sums of Euro currencies in fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031