Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs K.M.Mammen (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCIT Vs K.M.Mammen (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Since the penalty was reduced from 300% to 100% of the tax sought to be evaded, assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 279(1A) of Income Tax.  Moreover, department having failed to challenge the order passed by Single Judge in earlier, could not challenge the directions given by the Court for compounding of criminal prosecution.

Held: Assessee was the Chairman and Managing Director of MRF Limited

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31