Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs R. Dhinagharan (HUF) (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs R. Dhinagharan (HUF) (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai held that there is no violation of provisions of section 269SS when all sale deeds were registered and cash payment was made at one go before the sub-registrar at the time of registration of sale deeds of plots. Hence, penalty u/s 271D not leviable. Facts- The assessee during the course of business sold various plots to various people for a total consideration of Rs. 3,03,46,301/- in cash. The assessee has not received any advance but entire sale consideration were received at the time of registration of sale deeds in cash and non transac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930