Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiran Infertility Central Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiran Infertility Central Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Payment for surrogacy charges which to be paid to surrogate mothers is not liable to TDS u/s 194J: ITAT Assessee-Company was running an infertility clinic. It paid certain sum as surrogacy charges without deducting TDS thereon. Assessing Officer (AO) concluded that said payments were in nature of Fees for Technical Services under Section 194J as well as contractual payment under Section 194C requiring mandatory TDS deduction. CIT(A) upheld the order passed by AO Assessee contended that it was neither a party to the corresponding...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Having considerable knowledge and profound experience of working in areas of Statutory Audits, Internal Audits, Bank Audit, Accounting, Taxation, Corporate Law, RERA Compliances, System Audit and Corporate Financing. Feel Free to Contact at 9079374758 View Full Profile

My Published Posts

AAR have no jurisdiction to go beyond issues referred: Kerala High Court Circulars cannot prevail over Statute: Madras High Court Section 79 GST Recovery cannot be initiated without determinng tax liability CGST Act not empower officials to record statements of family members through Coercion Services of Author – Option to pay under Forward Charge View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date