Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sumana Arora Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sumana Arora Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Technical Lapse Shouldn’t Defeat 115BAC Benefit- Form 10-IE Delay Is Procedural: ITAT Restores New Tax Regime Claim Bangalore ITAT “B” Bench, in Sumana Arora Vs ITO  (ITA Nos. 2449 & 2450/Bang/2024, AYs 2022-23 & 2023-24; order dated 31.01.2025), set aside the orders of CPC & CIT(A) and remanded the matter for de-novo consideration of the option exercised u/s 115BAC, holding that mere procedural delay in filing Form 10-IE should not defeat substantive tax benefit. Assessee had opted for the new tax regime u/s 115BAC by filing Form 10-IE ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031