Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ameeta Paramanand Nadkarni Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ameeta Paramanand Nadkarni Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) VSV Form-3 Without Payment Doesn’t Bar Appeal: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹7.65 Lakh Demonetisation Addition   Mumbai   ITAT allowed the Assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹7,64,940 made u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE relating to demonetisation-period cash deposits. The AO had accepted part of the cash deposits of ₹17.56 lakh and treated the balance ₹7.64 lakh as unexplained. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal solely on the ground that the Assessee had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and Form-3 had been issued. The Tribunal he...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031