Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs J L G Developers Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs J L G Developers Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Loan Liability ≠ Trading Liability: No 41(1) Addition Even if Company Struck Off AO made addition of Rs.8.22 crore u/s 41(1) alleging cessation of liability, on the ground that assessee-company had been struck off by ROC u/s 248 of Companies Act & therefore liability towards M/s Sethi Housing Pvt Ltd had ceased. CIT(A) deleted the addition, holding that amount was a loan/advance used to repay Bank of India loan, never claimed as expenditure, never written back in P&L & continued to appear as outstanding liability. ITAT upheld CIT(A)’s o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031