Section 41

Treatment of Cessation of Liabilities – Section 41 – Case Laws

Income Tax - Section 41(1) provides for taxing any amount benefit which was obtained by a person with respect to any loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred in any earlier Assessment Years. The Section is re-produced as under...

Read More

Making Chargeable to Tax U/s. 41(1) of Allowance/Deduction Already Made

Income Tax - The Supreme Court in CCIT vs. Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd. (2002) 20 SITC 172 (SC) has laid down that the resort to section 41(1) can be taken only if the liability of the assessee can be said to have ceased finally and there is no possibility or reviving it. Also, it has held that an unilateral action on the part of the assessee by way of writin...

Read More

Analysis of Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax - In business there are circumstances where a person might have incurred a liability but later on he need not have to pay it for one or other reason. The Income Tax Act brings to tax such liabilities which are no more payable. ...

Read More
Sorry No Post Found

Deferred tax can neither be taxed U/s. 41(1) nor U/s. 28(4) of Income Tax

CIT Vs. M/S Mcdowell & Co Ltd Now Known As United Spirits Ltd (Karnataka High Court) - CIT Vs. M/S Mcdowell & Co Ltd Now Known As United Spirits Ltd (Karnataka High Court) In the instant case, as per the scheme he was allowed to retain the sales tax as determined by the competent authority and pay the same 15 years thereafter. The tax collected was deemed to have been paid and, [&...

Read More

Waiver of loan for acquiring capital assets not amount to cessation of trading liability

Commissioner Vs Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) - Waiver of loan for acquiring capital assets could not be taxed as perquisites under section 28(iv) since receipts were in the nature of cash or money. Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act does not apply since waiver of loan does not amount to cessation of trading liability. It is a matter of record ...

Read More

No Cessation of liability if Amount forfeited is subject matter of civil suit and cannot be taxed

Bharat Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) - Where amount forfeited by assessee against cancellation of booking of flat was subject-matter of civil suit, it could not be said that there was cessation of liability so as to tax such amount as assessee’s income....

Read More

Addition U/s. 41(1) cannot be made for Amount not paid due to long pending dispute

Pyramid Consulting Engineers (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) - Where due to pending disputes with debtors, sales commission could not be paid to agents for longer period, taxation of such liability payable to agents under section 41(1) was not justified....

Read More

Section 41(1) not applies if amount was not claimed in earlier year

Pr. CIT Vs Gujarat State Co-Op. Bank Ltd.(Gujarat High Court) - Section 41(1) of the Act in plain terms provides for adding back of an allowance or deduction which has been made by the assessee in any year in respect of loss expenditure or trading liability and subsequently during any previous year such liability ceases. The primary requirement of applicability ...

Read More
Sorry No Post Found

Recent Posts in "Section 41"

Treatment of Cessation of Liabilities – Section 41 – Case Laws

Section 41(1) provides for taxing any amount benefit which was obtained by a person with respect to any loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred in any earlier Assessment Years. The Section is re-produced as under...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Deferred tax can neither be taxed U/s. 41(1) nor U/s. 28(4) of Income Tax

CIT Vs. M/S Mcdowell & Co Ltd Now Known As United Spirits Ltd (Karnataka High Court)

CIT Vs. M/S Mcdowell & Co Ltd Now Known As United Spirits Ltd (Karnataka High Court) In the instant case, as per the scheme he was allowed to retain the sales tax as determined by the competent authority and pay the same 15 years thereafter. The tax collected was deemed to have been paid and, […]...

Read More

Waiver of loan for acquiring capital assets not amount to cessation of trading liability

Commissioner Vs Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)

Waiver of loan for acquiring capital assets could not be taxed as perquisites under section 28(iv) since receipts were in the nature of cash or money. Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act does not apply since waiver of loan does not amount to cessation of trading liability. It is a matter of record that the assessee had not claimed any de...

Read More

No Cessation of liability if Amount forfeited is subject matter of civil suit and cannot be taxed

Bharat Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Where amount forfeited by assessee against cancellation of booking of flat was subject-matter of civil suit, it could not be said that there was cessation of liability so as to tax such amount as assessee’s income....

Read More

Addition U/s. 41(1) cannot be made for Amount not paid due to long pending dispute

Pyramid Consulting Engineers (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Where due to pending disputes with debtors, sales commission could not be paid to agents for longer period, taxation of such liability payable to agents under section 41(1) was not justified....

Read More

Section 41(1) not applies if amount was not claimed in earlier year

Pr. CIT Vs Gujarat State Co-Op. Bank Ltd.(Gujarat High Court)

Section 41(1) of the Act in plain terms provides for adding back of an allowance or deduction which has been made by the assessee in any year in respect of loss expenditure or trading liability and subsequently during any previous year such liability ceases. The primary requirement of applicability of this provision therefore is where an ...

Read More

Section 41(1) cannot be invoked by revenue without showing that such liability had, in fact, ceased to exist

Pr. CIT Vs. Dharmendra Jagdishbhai Dubal (Gujarat High Court)

(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 23,04,369 by considering the same to be service tax? (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 53,...

Read More

Non recovery of debtors for almost 3 years is sufficient reason to write off and claim as revenue loss

General Capital and Holding Company Pvt. Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer (ITAT Ahmedabad)

In the case between General Capital and Holding Company Pvt. Ltd vs Income Tax Officer, Ahmedabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that deduction under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act 1961 is allowable in the year of actual payment as well as that of getting the necessary donation receipt....

Read More

Section 41(1) not apples if loan waiver not amounts to cessation of trading liability

The Commissioner Vs Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)

These appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 29.01.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in R.A.No.1561 (Bom)/1982 and R.A.No.5161/B/80 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court while giving answers to the Reference Applications filed by the Respondent as well as the Revenue, confirmed cer...

Read More

Waiver of loan taken on capital account cannot be taxed U/s. 41(1)

Shrm Food & Allied Services (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Total dues payable by the Bank consisted of principal component and interest component. The principal Component being a loan in respect of which no deduction, benefit or loss was either claimed or allowed, was transferred to Capital Reserve Account and interest component was duly credited to the Profit and Loss Account and also offered to...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,827)
Company Law (4,005)
Custom Duty (7,033)
DGFT (3,742)
Excise Duty (4,154)
Fema / RBI (3,505)
Finance (3,715)
Income Tax (27,898)
SEBI (2,937)
Service Tax (3,394)

Featured Posts

Search Posts by Date

September 2018
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930