Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Jayesh Umakant Manania (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Jayesh Umakant Manania (ITAT Mumbai) ₹2 Cr Cash Addition Crumbles: Third-Party iPhone Notes, No Corroboration, No 65B—ITAT Mumbai Upholds Deletion In a reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3), AO made addition of ₹2,00,00,000/- u/s 69A alleging unexplained cash paid for booking flats in “Vivaria”, solely on the basis of images/loose notings extracted from the iPhone of a third party (Shri Pankaj Goshar) during search/survey in connected cases. Assessee consistently denied any cash payment, stated no flat was booked in AY 2012-13, pointed out that all later transactions were...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031