Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/144B is invalid where mandatory notice u/s 143(2) was not issued. Assessee had originally filed return u/s 139(1) & in response to notice u/s 148, duly intimated AO to treat the original return as return filed pursuant to reopening. Despite this, AO failed to issue notice u/s 143(2) & proceeded to complete reassessment making addition of ₹1.24 crore towards cash credit. Tribunal admitted the additional legal ground challenging jurisdiction, holding that such a pure question of law can...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031