Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chintan Umedsinh Sodha Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chintan Umedsinh Sodha Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) No Bogus Evidence Found- From Rs.13.91 Lakh to Rs.1.39 Lakh: ITAT Applies 10% Estimate in Agriculture & Tuition Case Assessee declared total income of Rs.3,99,350 & agricultural income of Rs.4,95,050. AO, during scrutiny u/s 143(3), treated agricultural income of Rs.8,15,200 & tuition income of Rs.5,75,800 as unexplained income, holding that Assessee failed to produce sale bills, vouchers for agricultural expenses, or adequate proof for tuition such as student details, fee structure & tutor qualifications. CIT(A)-NFAC confirmed additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031