Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Lionbridge Technologies LLP (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Lionbridge Technologies LLP (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Deleted After Quantum Addition Was Quashed—Revenue Appeal Dismissed; No Basis to Keep Penalty Alive Assessment was reopened u/s 147 & completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 on 29.03.2016 determining income at ₹20.64 Cr. Assessee succeeded before ITAT (in ITA No.610/Mum/2018 dated 27.05.2020), & quantum addition was deleted in full. Consequentially, AO levied 100% penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of ₹6,92,76,334/- on 31.03.2019. CIT(A) deleted the penalty relying on the ITAT’s quantum order, holding that once quantum does not ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031