Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mamta Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Mamta Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)

Third-Party Search, Third-Party Excel – ITAT Protects Genuine Buyer- No Cash, Only Bank Trail: Section 69 Addition Struck Down

Tribunal examined addition of Rs.5,07,690/- u/s 69 alleged as unexplained investment on the basis of an excel sheet seized during search on Wallfort Group. AO treated the amount as cash paid by Assessee for flat E-802 in Wallfort Heights & CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the view.

Assessee produced before Tribunal complete bank trail: RTGS of Rs.5,07,748.42 made on 22.07.2019, matching exactly wi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031