Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mamta Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mamta Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur) Third-Party Search, Third-Party Excel – ITAT Protects Genuine Buyer- No Cash, Only Bank Trail: Section 69 Addition Struck Down Tribunal examined addition of Rs.5,07,690/- u/s 69 alleged as unexplained investment on the basis of an excel sheet seized during search on Wallfort Group. AO treated the amount as cash paid by Assessee for flat E-802 in Wallfort Heights & CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the view. Assessee produced before Tribunal complete bank trail: RTGS of Rs.5,07,748.42 made on 22.07.2019, matching exactly with the figure in the seized excel sheet. Re...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031