Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kusum Sahgal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kusum Sahgal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Joint Ownership Not a Bar for 54F—Assessee Owning Only Fractional Shares Eligible for Full Deduction; AO & CIT(A) Orders Set Aside Assessee filed return declaring Rs.66.14 crores & claimed long-term capital gains exemption u/s 54F on investment of Rs.21.28 crores in a residential unit at “The Camellias”, DLF, Gurgaon, arising from sale of shares of Quality Needles Pvt Ltd. AO denied deduction u/s 54F on the ground that Assessee jointly owned more than one residential property on the date of transfer & further disallowed share-transfer expense...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031