The ROC penalized the company and its officer for filing incorrect AGM details in a statutory return. It held that accuracy of e-forms is mandatory and errors attract penalty despite later correction.
The ROC penalized the company and its directors for not filing financial statements within the prescribed timeline. It held that non-compliance with mandatory filing obligations attracts strict penalties.
A company was penalized for filing incorrect details in MGT-7 despite claiming a clerical mistake. The ruling clarifies that errors in statutory filings attract penalties even if later corrected.
The case involved failure to attend hearings and file an affidavit as directed. The Committee imposed a penalty and warning, emphasizing strict compliance with tribunal orders.
The authority introduced a digital system to track and manage food recalls. It enables regulators, businesses, and consumers to access real-time recall information.
The board directed offices to function on Mahavir Jayanti. The move ensures completion of financial year-end work without disruption.
FSSAI has issued detailed guidelines dividing responsibilities between buyer and seller apps in the ONDC model. The order ensures accountability, food safety, and regulatory compliance in decentralized e-commerce transactions.
ROC imposed a ₹10,000 penalty for incorrect AOC-4 XBRL filing due to errors in attachments and certification. The ruling reinforces strict liability for accuracy in MCA e-forms.
The authority penalized the Managing Director for incorrectly reporting the AGM date in MGT-7. It held that even clerical errors violate Rule 8(3), attracting Section 450 where no specific penalty exists.
ROC imposed heavy penalty for failing to appoint a Company Secretary within six months. The ruling stresses strict adherence to Section 203 timelines.
